Techniques to Improve Sweetener Taste
Non-nutritive sweeteners present persistent taste challenges in food manufacturing, with steviol glycosides exhibiting lingering sweetness that can exceed 30 seconds and bitter notes detected at concentrations as low as 100 ppm. These sensory limitations have restricted their use in beverages and foods where clean taste profiles are essential for consumer acceptance.
The fundamental challenge lies in modifying molecular structures and interactions to achieve rapid onset, controlled sweetness duration, and minimal off-notes while maintaining the caloric advantages of non-nutritive sweeteners.
This page brings together solutions from recent research—including targeted use of sensory modifiers like caffeic acid esters, strategic glycosylation of steviol compounds, and synergistic blending with proteins like brazzein and complementary sweeteners. These and other approaches provide food scientists with practical tools to optimize sweetener performance in commercial applications.
1. Sensory sweetness and sourness interactive response of sucrose-citric acid mixture based on synergy and antagonism
Yuezhong Mao, Shiyi Tian, Yumei Qin - Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022
The clarity of taste sensation interaction is a key basis for promoting the food sensory science research and its application to the beverage and food additive industries. This study explored the synergy and antagonism effect of sucrose-citric acid mixture and established an optimized method to determine the human sweetness and sourness interactive response. Sucrose-citric acid mixtures were evaluated by the "close type" question. According to the sensory difference strength curves and Weber-Fechner law, citric acid increased the sucrose's absolute threshold (0.424-0.624%) and weber fraction (20.5-33.0%). Meanwhile, sucrose increased citric acid's absolute threshold (0.0057-0.0082%) and decreased its weber fraction (17.96-9.53%). By fitting absolute threshold and weber fraction variation equations, the sweet-sour taste sensory strength variation models (SSTVM) were derived, which could be used to explain the synergy and antagonism effect of sweet-sour taste. According to the SSTVM, the interactive response to sweet-sour taste could be quantitatively calculated. The high coincidence b... Read More
2. Changes in temporal sensory profile, liking, satiety, and postconsumption attributes of yogurt with natural sweeteners
Diksha Chadha, Nazimah Hamid, Kevin Kantono - Wiley, 2022
Abstract Sweetened yogurts can contain between 10 and 13% added sugar. However, studies have shown that sugar reduction or replacement can influence yogurt quality. The main objective of this research was to investigate the effects of yogurt with added natural sweeteners on temporal sensory profile, liking, satiety and postconsumption measures. Yogurt samples were prepared with iso‐sweet concentrations of sucrose (9 g/100 g of plain yogurt) using xylitol (10 g/100 g), stevia (0.15 g/100 g), and monk fruit (0.15 g/100 g). Fifty panelists evaluated the temporal sensory profile of these yogurts using multiple‐intake temporal dominance of sensations (TDS), and overall liking for each intake. In addition, satiety (hunger, thirst, and fullness) and other postconsumption attributes (healthiness, satisfaction, and purchase intent) were determined. The temporal profile of yogurt sweetened with xylitol was similar to yogurt sweetened with sucrose without any onset of negative sensory characteristics at any point in intake. Yogurt sweetened with stevia had a high dominance duration for astringe... Read More
3. Sugar reduction without compromising sensory perception. An impossible dream?
Scott C. Hutchings, Julia Low, Russell Keast - Informa UK Limited, 2019
Sugar reduction is a major technical challenge for the food industry to address in response to public health concerns regarding the amount of added sugars in foods. This paper reviews sweet taste perception, sensory methods to evaluate sugar reduction and the merits of different techniques available to reduce sugar content. The use of sugar substitutes (non-nutritive sweeteners, sugar alcohols, and fibres) can achieve the greatest magnitude of sugar and energy reduction, however bitter side tastes and varying temporal sweet profiles are common issues. The use of multisensory integration principles (particularly aroma) can be an effective approach to reduce sugar content, however the magnitude of sugar reduction is small. Innovation in food structure (modifying the sucrose distribution, serum release and fracture mechanics) offers a new way to reduce sugar without significant changes in food composition, however may be difficult to implement in food produced on a large scale. Gradual sugar reduction presents difficulties for food companies from a sales perspective if acceptability is ... Read More
4. Comparison of Temporal Profiles among Sucrose, Sucralose, and Acesulfame Potassium after Swallowing Sweetened Coffee Beverages and Sweetened Water Solutions
Naomi Gotow, Shinji Esumi, Hirofumi Kubota - MDPI AG, 2018
Non-nutritive sweeteners have been used as substitutes for nutritive sweeteners with the goal of preventing obesity and dental caries. The main factor responsible for the difference in taste between beverages containing a nutritive sweetener and those containing a non-nutritive sweetener is the temporal profile of sensory attributes. In this study, untrained panelists performed a time–intensity evaluation of sweetness, using one coffee beverage containing a nutritive sweetener (sucrose) and two coffee beverages containing non-nutritive sweeteners (sucralose or acesulfame potassium (acesulfame K)). They evaluated continuously perceived intensity of sweetness for 150 s after swallowing each coffee beverage. We did not detect a significant difference in temporal profiles among the three coffee beverages. To investigate why the temporal profiles of the three coffee beverages followed similar traces, all untrained participants who had participated in the coffee beverage session also performed a time–intensity evaluation of sweetness using three water solutions (sucrose-sweetened, sucralos... Read More
5. Sensory Characteristics and Relative Sweetness of Tagatose and Other Sweeteners
Tomomi Fujimaru, Jin‐Hee Park, Juyun Lim - Wiley, 2012
Abstract: The present study investigated the sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose, an emerging natural low‐calorie sweetener with various functional properties, compared to other sweeteners (sucrose, sucralose, erythritol, rebaudioside A), over a wide range of sweetness commonly found in foods and beverages (3% to 20% sucrose [w/v]). A total of 34 subjects evaluated aqueous solutions of the 5 sweeteners for the perceived intensities of sweetness, bitterness, astringency, chemical‐like sensations, and sweet aftertaste, using the general version of the Labeled Magnitude Scale. The relationship between the physical concentrations of the sweeteners and their perceived sweetness (that is, psychophysical functions) was derived to quantify the relative sweetness and potency of the sweeteners. The results suggest that tagatose elicits a sweet taste without undesirable qualities (bitterness, astringency, chemical‐like sensations). Out of the 5 sweeteners tested, rebaudioside A was the only sweetener with notable bitterness and chemical‐like sensations, which became progr... Read More
6. Permeation of Amphipathic Sweeteners into Taste-Bud Cells and Their Interactions with Post-Receptor Signaling Components: Possible Implications for Sweet-Taste Quality
M. Naim, Merav E. Shaul, Andrew Spielman - American Chemical Society, 2008
The sweetness of sugar is regarded by humans as the optimal sensation; that of alternative non-sugar sweeteners possesses an inferior sweet quality, which limits their use in low-calorie foods. These sweeteners may produce bitter, metallic or cooling sensations, as well as lingering sweet aftertaste. The molecular basis for these undesirable sensations is poorly understood. Although various sweeteners may stimulate the same G-protein-coupled taste receptors (GPCRs), inferior sweet-taste quality is uniquely related to some non-sugar sweeteners. This chapter presents data indicating that such tastants may rapidly permeate taste cells under physiological conditions in vivo and interact with downstream signaling components such as signal-termination-related kinases in vitro. The implications of these properties for sweet-taste quality are discussed.
7. Individual Differences in Perceived Bitterness Predict Liking of Sweeteners
Jennifer Kay Kamerud, Jeannine Delwiche - Oxford University Press (OUP), 2007
Although recent molecular studies suggest that only one receptor and one signaling pathway are involved in the perception of sweetness, this seems to contradict everyday experience that people not only have different likes and dislikes of certain sweeteners but also perceive the sweeteners differently. One possible explanation is that variation in liking of sweeteners is due, in part, to variation across individuals in sensitivity to nonsweet tastes, such as bitterness, which are transduced by a variety of receptors. Fifty individuals were asked to rate intensities of several taste attributes of 10 sweeteners and to give hedonic assessments of each sweetener. Additionally, their sensitivity to 6-n-propyl-3-thiouracil (PROP) was determined. Results indicated that when matched for sweetness, the perception of bitterness and the sweetener compound were the 2 largest factors contributing to overall liking of a sweetener. Sensitivity to PROP did not contribute significantly to the model.
8. Chewing Gum Formulation with Specific Gum Base Composition for Mucosal Cannabinoid Delivery
NORDICCAN AS, 2025
Chewing gum formulation for mucosal delivery of cannabinoids that provides improved release and sensory properties compared to conventional gum bases. The gum contains a water-insoluble gum base with specific ratios of natural resins, elastomers, and elastomer plasticizers. The cannabinoids are mixed into the gum base in close proximity with high intensity sweeteners. This allows better release and taste masking. The gum also has water-soluble chewing gum ingredients separated from the base. This allows customization of the chewing experience.
9. Sensory characterization of stevia-substituted low-calorie apricot drinks
hatice reyhan oziyci, mustafa karhan - Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 2025
The objective of this study was to investigate the sensory characteristics apricot drinks that were sweetened using stevia. examination stevia powder revealed comparable levels sweetness sucrose, albeit with a more prominent perception bitterness. When substitution rate 75%, and overall preference parameters obtained highest scores among other drink samples. Nevertheless, utilization pure extract resulted in unfavorable flavor attributes (e.g., bitter, metallic, acidic tastes, as well chemical synthetic odors). An increase concentration stevia, combined reduction sucrose content, notable decrease energy content samples, while maintaining an acceptable profile. containing 75% significantly decreased by 60% received great ratings from panelists. However, has led development sour, pronounced, metallic disagreeable odors. On hand, use at sucrose-substitution ratios 25% or 50% showed positive taste characteristics.
10. Sugar Replacement in Chocolate-Flavored Milk: Differences in Consumer Segments’ Liking of Sweetener Systems Relate to Temporal Perception
Glenn Andersen, Caroline Laura Dam Christensen, John C. Castura - MDPI AG, 2024
Chocolate-flavored milk contributes to excessive intake of added sugars among children and adolescents, which why it is a good candidate product for sucrose replacement. This study investigates how replacing sucrose partially or completely with different sweetener systems affects the sensory profile and consumer liking. Five chocolate-flavored milk treatments were formulated, varying in sucrose replacement level (partial: 58%; complete: 100%) and sweetener system (synthetic: acesulfame-K; natural: rebaudioside M-erythritol blend). Relative-to-Reference Scaling by a trained panel confirmed that no significant differences in the sensory profile when partial sucrose replacement was compared to sucrose, whereas the complete replacement increased bitter taste, pungent flavor, licorice flavor and mouth-drying. A total of 104 consumers evaluated the treatments for liking and indicated their temporal perceptions with temporal check-all-that-apply. Latent variable clustering performed on liking ratings revealed two clusters, which perceived temporal sensory characteristics differently dependi... Read More
11. Sweet–bitter taste interactions in binary mixtures of sweeteners: Relationship between taste receptor activities and sensory perception
Yoonha Choi, Run Rou Wong, Yeon Kyung - Elsevier BV, 2024
This study investigated the effects of various binary sweetener mixtures on sweetness enhancement and their interactions with sweet or bitter taste receptors, focusing on sensory perception and receptor activity. Acesulfame K or saccharin was mixed with allulose, aspartame, erythritol, fructose, glucose, or sucrose to match a target sucrose sweetness. The effects of the mixtures on sweet and bitter taste receptors (in the human embryonic kidney −293 cells) and sensory taste intensities were evaluated. Sweetness enhancement at the sweet taste receptor level was observed in some cases, with several monosaccharides reducing the acesulfame K- or saccharin-induced bitter taste receptor activity. Combining acesulfame K or saccharin with any of the six sweeteners perceptually enhanced sweetness (60% ∼ 100% in 50:50 ratio), correlating with a reduction in inherent bitterness (−35% ∼ −63% in 50:50 ratio). This finding suggests that sweetness perception likely increased because the monosaccharides mitigate the activation of bitter receptors caused by high-potency sweeteners.
12. Acute and two-week effects of neotame, stevia rebaudioside M and sucrose-sweetened biscuits on postprandial appetite and endocrine response in adults with overweight/obesity—a randomised crossover trial from the SWEET consortium
Catherine Gibbons, Kristine Beaulieu, Eva Almiron‐Roig - Elsevier BV, 2024
Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SE) are used to replace energy yielding sugars and maintain sweet taste in a wide range of products, but controversy exists about their effects on appetite and endocrine responses in reduced or no added sugar solid foods. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the acute (1 day) and repeated (two-week daily) ingestive effects of 2 S&SE vs. sucrose formulations of biscuit with fruit filling on appetite and endocrine responses in adults with overweight and obesity.
13. Global Sugar Reduction Trends and Challenges: Exploring Aroma Sweetening as an Alternative to Sugar Reduction
Di Zhao, Yue Chen, Jiayi Xia - Elsevier BV, 2024
Excessive sugar consumption is associated with a variety of health problems. Sugar reduction is challenging as it affects the texture and flavor of food. Furthermore, the safety of non-nutritive sweeteners has become the subject of increasing scrutiny and debate, necessitating a more rigorous evaluation of long-term health impacts and potential alternatives. Aroma-induced sweetening is expected to be a healthier strategy for sugar reduction. This review focuses on the physiological basis of sweetness perception. It explains the neural pathway of aroma sweetening and elaborates on the mechanism of action of aroma sweetening in terms of the neural and psychological factors of olfactory-taste synergy. Additionally, it summarizes the subjective and objective factors affecting the sweetness perception of aroma sweetening, including individual differences, aroma, multisensory synergy, and sensory analysis methods. Aroma sweetening represents a promising approach to glucose reduction, affecting sweet perception through the olfactory-taste pathway. When applying aroma sweetening, the aroma s... Read More
14. SWEETENERS: CLASSIFICATION, PROPERTIES, APPLICATION IN THE TECHNOLOGY OF SOFT DRINKS
Р. Б. Косів - National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute, 2023
Due to healthy eating trends, the needs of diabetics, and economic advantages, the production of sweeteners, their range, and the range of beverages containing them are constantly expanding. At the same time, there are difficulties associated with the necessary selection of sweetening agents to solve specific problems. The data of modern scientific literature on the technological aspects of the use of sweeteners in the production of soft drinks are summarized and their choice for obtaining drinks of the corresponding functional direction is substantiated. All sweeteners can be divided into six groups: sugars, sweeteners (sweet alcohols), synthetic sweeteners, natural sweeteners, natural sugary products, and sugary products derived from starch or sugar. The main properties of various sweeteners are compared: sweetness factor, caloric content, glycemic index. The potential adverse effects that may occur when consuming beverages prepared with their use are analyzed. Natural sugary products are generally less sweet than sugar, while artificial sweeteners have a higher sweetness than sucr... Read More
15. Steviol Glycoside Compositions with Sensory Modifying Ester Compounds
CARGILL, INCORPORATED, 2023
Steviol glycoside compositions with one or more sensory modifier compounds to improve the sensory attributes of taste, such as reducing lingering sweetness. The sensory modifier compounds can include certain caffeic acid esters, quinic acid esters, and ferulic acid esters.
16. Stevia Sweetener Composition with Caffeoylquinic Acid Salt Sensory Modifier
CARGILL, INCORPORATED, 2023
Reducing bitterness and sweetness linger of stevia sweeteners by adding a sensory modifier containing a combination of caffeoylquinic acids and their salts. The modifier must be at least 50% salts to effectively improve taste.
17. Sweetener Composition with Stevia Leaf Extract, Purified Steviol Glycosides, and Luo Han Guo Fruit Extract
James and Carol May Family, LLLP, 2023
A natural sweetener composition with reduced aftertaste and enhanced taste compared to stevia alone. It comprises a combination of stevia leaf extract, purified steviol glycosides, and Luo Han Guo fruit extract.
18. Sweetener Composition of Rebaudioside M and Brazzein Protein
Sweegen,Inc, 2023
A low calorie sweetener composition that combines the stevia glycoside Rebaudioside M with the protein brazzein to provide a natural non-caloric sweetener with improved taste profile compared to other stevia-based sweeteners. The composition can be used in foods, beverages, oral care products, and pharmaceuticals.
19. Sweetening Composition with High Rebaudioside B Concentration in Stevia Extracts
Tate & Lyle Solutions USA LLC, 2023
Sweeteners with a reduced bitter taste and more like natural sugar by using high levels of the steviol glycoside rebaudioside B. Rebaudioside B is added in Stevia extracts and sweetening compositions to reduce bitterness and licorice aftertaste. A concentration of at least 10% by weight of the total steviol glycosides provides a more desirable taste profile.
20. Beverage and Food Composition with D-Psicose, Erythritol, and Optional Rebaudioside M for Enhanced Sweetness Profile
PepsiCo, Inc., 2023
Diet and low-calorie beverages and foods with improved taste profiles. The products use a combination of natural sweeteners D-psicose and erythritol, along with optionally rebaudioside M from stevia. This combination provides good upfront sweetness, reduces bitterness, and enhances taste compared to using one sweetener alone.
Get Full Report
Access our comprehensive collection of 451 documents related to this technology