Fault Protection in CGM Devices
16 patents in this list
Updated:
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices operate in challenging physiological environments where sensor performance can degrade over time. Current CGM systems face accuracy variations of 10-15% MARD (Mean Absolute Relative Difference), with sensor failures occurring in 2-5% of deployments due to biofouling, mechanical stress, or chemical interference.
The engineering challenge centers on maintaining measurement reliability while managing the inherent tradeoffs between redundancy, device size, and power consumption in a system that must operate continuously for 7-14 days.
This page brings together solutions from recent research—including orthogonally redundant sensor arrays, real-time sensitivity monitoring algorithms, fault discrimination based on clinical context, and adaptive calibration methods. These and other approaches focus on maintaining continuous glucose data availability while minimizing false alarms and missed detection of glycemic events.
1. Glucose Sensor System with Cross-Referencing Using Secondary Physiological Measurements
ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 2023
Improving accuracy and fault detection of glucose sensors using secondary physiological measurements. The method involves cross-referencing glucose level readings from a glucose sensor with secondary physiological measurements like lactate, ketone, or heart rate. If both metrics indicate a low glucose condition, it confirms true hypoglycemia. If the secondary metric doesn't support low glucose, it indicates a false low. This allows more aggressive lag correction and fault detection. It also enables discerning true vs false low glucose conditions to improve overall low-end accuracy.
2. Closed-Loop Insulin Infusion System with Orthogonally Redundant Optical and Electrochemical Glucose Sensors
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc., 2022
Closed-loop insulin infusion systems using orthogonally redundant glucose sensors for improved accuracy and reliability. The system has two glucose sensors, one optical and one electrochemical, to provide orthogonal redundancy. An algorithm combines the sensor data to improve accuracy and reliability. If one sensor fails, the other can provide glucose values. The sensors have features like distributed electrodes and membrane barriers to reduce drift and fouling. The system uses on-demand calibration rather than frequent fingersticks.
3. Redundant Glucose Sensor System with Inter-Communicating Sensors for Continuous Monitoring
Cercacor Laboratories, Inc., 2021
Redundant glucose sensor system for diabetes management that provides continuous monitoring when one sensor is a warmup, stabilization, or end of life. Multiple glucose sensors attach to a patient simultaneously and communicate with each other. If a sensor is in a non-operational state, another sensor provides glucose data. This ensures continuous monitoring and reduces the risk of missed readings. The sensors can be separate devices or integrated into insulin pumps. The redundant sensors can also be used in a dual pump configuration for improved insulin delivery reliability.
4. Sensor Fault Detection System in Biomedical Devices Using Analyte Metric Threshold Analysis
ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 2021
Detection of sensor faults in biomedical devices like glucose monitors to improve accuracy and prevent misdiagnosis. The method involves calculating analyte metrics like rate of change and sum of levels from sensor data. When these metrics exceed predetermined thresholds, it indicates a suspected sensor fault. This allows early detection of issues like moisture ingress that can affect sensor performance.
5. Medical Device Component Self-Check System with Inter-Device Failure Reporting and Alarm Triggering
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., 2021
Mitigating single-point failures in medical devices like glucose monitors by having them periodically check their components and report the results to other devices. If a component fails, an alarm is triggered. This allows redundant monitoring and detection of device failures.
6. Orthogonally Redundant Glucose Sensing System with Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Continuous Monitoring
MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC, 2020
Orthogonally redundant glucose sensing for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management. The system uses two types of glucose sensors, electrochemical and optical, to improve accuracy and reliability compared to single sensor CGMs. It involves calibration, integrity checks, and fusion techniques to leverage the redundancy. The sensors are calibrated separately when possible, and if one fails integrity, the other's output is corrected and calibrated. Fused sensor glucose values are calculated based on weighted values from each sensor using reliability indices. This provides robust glucose monitoring with redundant sensors.
7. Implantable Blood Glucose Sensor with Selective Wireless Communication and Redundant Sensing Mechanism
GlySens Incorporated, 2019
Implantable blood glucose sensor with opportunistic wireless communication to extend battery life and implantation duration. The sensor periodically transmits signals without data if no new glucose values are detected. External devices can enable communication when needed. The sensor also uses onboard processing to analyze glucose levels and determine if wireless communication is necessary. This selective communication reduces power consumption compared to continuous transmission. The sensor can also have redundant glucose sensors with one acting as a reference to extend calibration intervals.
8. Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with Contextual Fault Discrimination and Responsive Signal Processing
DexCom, Inc., 2019
Fault discrimination and responsive processing in continuous glucose monitoring systems that take into account clinical context to improve accuracy and user experience. The method involves detecting faults in the sensor signal and then discriminating the type of fault based on the signal and clinical context like age, activity level, drugs, etc. Appropriate responsive processing is then performed based on the fault type and clinical context. This allows targeted actions like filtering, alerts, or recalibration based on the nature of the fault and patient context.
9. Glucose Sensor Signal Analysis with Responsiveness Metrics for Reliability Assessment
Medtronic Minimed, Inc., 2019
Analyzing the reliability of a glucose sensor signal to determine if the sensor is still accurately measuring blood glucose levels over time. The reliability is assessed by detecting changes in sensor responsiveness based on metrics like dispersion of rate change in measurements and mean values over time intervals. Decreases in sensitivity indicate sensor degradation. This allows proactive replacement of sensors before they become unreliable.
10. Glucose Sensor Fault Detection via Temporal Data Analysis and Physiological Plausibility Metrics
ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 2018
Detecting faults in glucose monitoring systems without requiring user blood samples. The method involves analyzing glucose sensor data over time to identify faults like the end of sensor life or faulty calibration. It compares sensor readings taken at different times to determine if the sensor is providing data that is physiologically implausible or outside normal ranges. The method uses metrics like median glucose and variability to identify faults based on sensor data trends.
11. Continuous Glucose Monitor Sensitivity Decline Detection via Signal Analysis and Statistical Verification
ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PATENT FOUNDATION, 2018
Real-time detection of declining sensitivity in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors to accurately identify when CGM sensors are losing sensitivity. It involves analyzing CGM current signals and comparing them to blood glucose levels to estimate the sensitivity ratio. If the estimated sensitivity ratio falls below a threshold, it indicates declining sensor sensitivity. A statistical analysis using a single blood glucose measurement confirms the sensitivity decline. This two-step process reduces false positives. The decline is verified by comparing the estimated sensitivity to a threshold based on the blood glucose.
12. Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System with Dual Redundant Glucose Sensors for Predictive Validation and Error Detection
MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC, 2018
Closed loop insulin delivery system using redundant glucose sensors to improve reliability and safety. The system has two glucose sensors in different locations. It predicts the glucose value from one sensor using the other sensor as input. By comparing the predicted to the actual reading, it detects sensor failures. It also determines which sensor has lower error and uses that one for infusion control. This allows using two sensors with different characteristics to corroborate and validate each other's readings.
13. Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with Artifact-Responsive Hypoglycemic Alarm Delay Mechanism
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc., 2017
Reducing false hypoglycemic alarms from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in diabetic patients. The technique involves delaying the hypoglycemic alarm response based on the user's glucose range and CGM signal artifact characteristics. When the user's glucose is mostly normal and the CGM signals have brief dropouts, the hypoglycemic threshold is increased to avoid false alarms due to artifacts. This allows longer delay before sounding an alarm, but still alerts in time for safe response to true hypoglycemic events.
14. Glucose Sensor Reliability Monitoring System with Data Trend Analysis for Operational Mode Transition
Medtronic Minimed, Inc., 2017
Monitoring the reliability of a glucose sensor to determine when it is no longer accurate enough to trust for closed-loop glucose control in a medical device like an insulin pump. The reliability metric is based on trends in the sensor data, such as reduced sensitivity, anomalies, drift, or noise. When the metric indicates the sensor is unreliable, it triggers a transition to manual or open-loop operation instead of relying on the sensor for glucose control.
15. Closed Loop Insulin Delivery System with Dual-Site Redundant Glucose Sensors for Error Detection and Fault Tolerance
MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC., 2011
Closed loop insulin delivery system that uses redundant glucose sensors to improve reliability and fault detection. The system has two glucose sensors at different sites. It corroborates the sensor readings by predicting one sensor's value using the other sensor's reading and then comparing the predicted and actual values. If the sum of errors exceeds a threshold, it indicates a sensor failure. The system then suspends closed-loop operation and initiates sensor replacement. If one sensor has less error, it uses that sensor's value for insulin delivery. This allows continued partial closed-loop operation with sensor redundancy until replacement.
16. Integrated System for Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery with Real-Time Basal and Bolus Adjustment
ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., 2010
Automated insulin delivery system for diabetes management that integrates continuous glucose monitoring and closed-loop insulin delivery. The system uses a glucose sensor, insulin pump, and controller to automate insulin delivery based on real-time glucose levels. It adjusts basal and bolus insulin rates, suspends delivery during bolus, and resumes basal. It also has safety features to mitigate calibration errors, prevent hypoglycemia, and suggest carbohydrate intake. The system aims to improve diabetes management, especially during sleep, by automating insulin delivery from glucose monitoring.
Request the PDF report with complete details of all 16 patents for offline reading.
These systems can give more accurate glucose readings, lower the risk of hypoglycemia, and enhance the general quality of life for people with diabetes by merging several sensors, putting sophisticated fault detection algorithms into practice, and employing redundant data processing approaches.